A formidable body of scientists have urged that drastic steps be taken
to reverse or at lest slow the change in global climate change which
they regard as potentially catastrophic.
In opposition to this group are the doubters, those who reject all
evidence of man-made contribution to the problem and the business
and monied interests who contend that to pursue the suggested
remedies would be ruinous, cost vast sums, damage industries and
cost jobs.
In 1660, Blaise Pascal, a French mathematician and theologian
advanced a proposition, which came to be known as "Pascal's
wager." The proposed wager was a bet - If there is a GOD and you
follow the church you will gain paradise. On the other hand if you
reject the church you will gain some minor indulgences in this life
and lose nothing if there is no GOD. However, if you choose wrongly
and there is a GOD you have gambled away an eternity in paradise
and suffer an eternity of torment, for the sake of a few minor
indulgences.
Applying this reasoning to the current global warming issue is a good
fit. If the scientists are correct then logic compels us to take
steps, drastic or not, to keep the planet habitable. If they are wrong
and we follow their advise we will have added some layers of hardship
and difficulty to our lives to no purpose. If, however, they are
correct and we ignore their suggestions, we imperil the very
survival of life on this planet.